Mary Meeker of Morgan Stanley recently released and presented her Internet Trends study at the CM Summit in New York City.
Amidst discussions of mobile, online advertising, e-commerce and international trends, the item that caught my eye related to the value of digital advertising compared to the time spent on online and to CPMs of other media.
I have heard this argument quite a bit as an indication of the undervaluation of digital ads versus other media and I do not necessarily disagree, but I think it is incomplete. In looking at the chart below from Meeker's strong presentation, both Internet and Radio have less Ad Spend than Time Spent, which by the basic definition would mean they are both undervalued.
That is certainly a debate that is common, but I think it misses the point because a brand will derive value not simply from the ad on a well-trafficked medium, but from the power of the relationship it can drive. These days, that brand relationship value is the combination of media, not each one in isolation.
I, therefore, do not happen to adhere to the idea that Time Spent and Ad Spend (along with CPMs) necessarily need to be equal for each medium because it is the combination of time spent across media that is the critical data to understand.
All media are there to drive brand relationships and the value placed on the time should reflect that capability. Impressions, clicks, comments, views both online and offline are all pieces of that brand relationship so focusing on on one medium as under or overvalued based solely on 2 data points I believe paints an incomplete picture.